During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
从“靠近人才”转向“靠近电力”。西海岸供电紧张、成本高企，巨头被迫向中西部、南部电力洼地迁移，形成“能源在哪里，算力就在哪里”的新格局。，这一点在91视频中也有详细论述
，推荐阅读谷歌浏览器【最新下载地址】获取更多信息
Replicate Toggle，这一点在夫子中也有详细论述
Grammarly vs ProWritingAid